My latest column: Why does China’s most secretive spy agency no longer wish to remain clandestine?
Reprinted from today's SCMP
Until recent years, the Ministry of State Security (MSS), China’s top spy agency, was one of the most secretive organisations in the country. For decades, the name plaque displayed at the front gate to a high-wall compound off Tiananmen Square in downtown Beijing was the only public sign of its existence even though reports suggested its real headquarters were based elsewhere.
Soon after President Xi Jinping came to power in late 2012, and particularly after he started to emphasise national security, the MSS – which performs roles roughly equivalent to those of both the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Central Intelligence Agency – has started to step into the light.
The ministry launched the hotline 12339 for residents to report suspicious activities on the one-year anniversary of the promulgation of the Counter-Espionage Law, offering up to 500,000 yuan (US$70,000) for tips which lead to arrests. This was followed by the launch of an internet reporting platform. Still, the MSS was largely on the receiving end of information and kept its thoughts private.
In August last year, however, the MSS suddenly thrust itself into the limelight after it launched an official account on WeChat one month after the revised Counter-Espionage Law came into effect. Since then, it has boldly asserted itself not only on espionage matters but also on national and international topical issues ranging from China-US relations to economic subjects, in which it warned against bad-mouthing China’s economic growth prospects.
The MSS’ daily musings and the way it asserted itself in public affairs have become a source of considerable interest among China watchers and media but also raised concerns and apprehensions among investors and business owners in the country. For instance, on Tuesday, the MSS for the first time laid out 10 conditions – mainly concerning national security, state secrets and anti-espionage law – that could lead to questioning by its agents, known in slang as “an invitation to tea”.
Why does China’s most secretive spy agency no longer wish to remain clandestine? First, China’s leadership has shifted its focus towards national security since 2018 when US President Donald Trump launched the trade war against China. Beijing has repeatedly accused Washington of trying to contain and suppress China through its network of allies.
In his keynote speech at the 20th Communist Party national congress in 2022, Xi devoted significant time to talking about national security and social stability, highlighting “political security as our fundamental task, economic security as our foundation, military, technological, cultural and social security as important pillars and international security as a support”.
China’s revised anti-espionage law, approved in April last year and taking effect last July, has significantly expanded the scope of activities that can be considered espionage amid a surge of raids on US-linked consultancy and due diligence firms. This has given MSS a perfect opportunity to make its mark in the public arena.
Second, China’s new spy chief Chen Yixin is believed to have pushed for MSS to take a high-profile role. Chen, 64, was appointed as the minister of MSS in October 2022 and is regarded as a member of Xi’s inner circle. He served in various senior positions in Zhejiang province when Xi was the provincial party secretary.
Before Chen became the spy chief, he was the secretary general of the powerful Central Political and Legal Affairs Commission in charge of law and order from 2018 to 2022. Among other things, he is known as a skilful writer for distilling and propagating Xi’s thoughts.
Third, the party leadership is believed to be working on a new addition, Xi Jinping Thought on National Security, to the overall political doctrine Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era. This was enshrined in both the party charter and the state constitution.
China has already announced six pillars to expand the scope of Xi’s doctrine – his thoughts on economy, diplomacy, military, environment, legal affairs and culture. Now, national security is believed to be one of several new pillars to come in the months or years ahead, and the MSS might intend to do its part to drum up support for the new pillar to be announced.
To be fair, the MSS is a latecomer to exploring social media to expand its public reach. The CIA launched its Twitter and Facebook accounts in June 2014. Richard Moore, the head of the UK Secret Intelligence Service also known as MI6, has a personal account on Twitter, dispensing words of wisdom and reposting government press releases.
But China’s heightened efforts to scrutinise businesses and investments with foreign connections have already made overseas investors very nervous. The MSS’ forceful comments could make them even more so.
For instance, following China’s annual meetings on economic and financial situation late last year, the MSS put out posts blasting those people with ulterior motives who were bearish about China and “badmouthing” China’s economic growth prospects, saying all those attempts were aimed at undermining the confidence of international investors and triggering financial turmoil in China. It also said those activities posed new challenges to China’s efforts to uphold financial security.
The MSS is expected to take an active role in the formulation of national security safeguard mechanisms in the economic and financial arenas. What do all these comments mean? Is the MSS trying to hint that it is prepared to go after those people who have misgivings about China’s economic policies? There are too many of them, to begin with.
The MSS has every reason to expand its public reach, but it needs to be more mindful of the potential impact of its daily musings. After all, it is a clandestine service.
End
MSS is less secretive partly because the world has changed greatly and it is much tougher to do anything secretly and also much less necessary because of national technical means. Also of course to recruit people and to improve its own image and Chinas image. China isn't a sponsor of terrorism and that's about the only remaining thing to be secretive about: though of course the struggle against terrorism still requires secrecy, but the secrecy is toward terrorists or individuals somehow related (sometimes literally) to terrorists or terrorism -- the target of most secrecy is not state actors.
What is this article really saying? Seems like not much... Hard to tell if this was for publication in SCMP or China Daily?